Sunday, October 4, 2015

Thoughts from Yared Yahu pt. 1

Words from Yared Yahu
I was once indicated by a person that he 'doesn't believe in hebrew'. Of course the world is led to believe that the Creator should change for you, not you change for Him. People just don't believe in Hebrew...



col 1:25-26
"Of this church I was made a minister according to the stewardship from Alahim bestowed on me for your benefit, so that I might fully carry out the preaching of the word of Alahim, 26 that is, the mystery which has been hidden from the past ages and generations, but has now been manifested to His saints"

So Mashiach is a mystery, revealed to those who are in the Word. The mystery is the Messiah and the belief in His Name is the answer to it.
This mystery is further explained in col 3 and col 4 and ephesians 3 and 4. A mystery indicates there is searching involved in finding the truth and the verse states only His saints will find it.

Jeremiah 6
 16Thus saith Yahuah, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein.

The ancient paths, the old ways, are the roads that we must take. This means understanding what Jeremiah was talking about in his era, not in our own. Once again this requires going to Alahim, not Him coming to you. 1 John 2 also discusses walking in the old ways.

Psalms 9:10
And they that know thy name will put their trust in thee: for thou, Yahuah, hast not forsaken them that seek thee.

Again seeking Him is key, knowing His Name and putting trust in His Word. But what does that mean, to trust His Word? It means keeping His commandments. The text also implies that some will know His Name and others wont.

Ecc 12:13
 Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear Alahim, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man


Pretty simple and contrary to what people believe to be the meaning of life. Solomon simply states here that the meaning of life is to fear Yahuah and keep His commandments. Of course the third commandment is to not take His Name in vain, where vain is the word shua, which means nothingness, desolation, non-use.


Matt 6:33
 But seek ye first the kingdom of Alahim, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.

Seeking the kingdom is of first importance. What are we going to be doing in our fathers kingdom but following His law and calling His Name. If we do neither now what right do we have in the kingdom? This is what we should worry about.  Matt 22 is a parable discussing the Kingdom of Alahim and the requirements thereof. The word righteousness is thrown around for so many things, so how does the bible define righteousness?

Deutoronomy 6:25
  25 And it shall be our righteousness, if we observe to do all these commandments before Yahuah Alahinu, as he hath commanded us.

THIS is the definition of righteousness, that we keep His commandments, as He commanded us. The word righteousness is Zadak in Hebrew, which directly translates to justice, lawful, right ruling etc and is also in the word Melchizadak (king of righteousness) which is the order under which the Messiah Yahusha is a priest. But why should we call on His Name in Hebrew?


Acts 26:14-15
 14And when we were all fallen to the earth, I heard a voice speaking unto me, and saying in the Hebrew tongue, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. 15And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Yahusha whom thou persecutest

Paul indicates directly that the Messiah told him His Name in Hebrew, not greek, not latin, not English. And since there is only one Name (acts 4:12), to be obedient unto righteousness (romans 6:16) is to call on this Name as it was then, not as it is now. But the bible is imfallible and all scripture is made for reproof and wisdom? How could the bible have mistakes or even deceptions?


Jeremiah 8:8-9
 8How do ye say, We are wise, and the law of Yahuah is with us? Lo, certainly in vain made he it; the pen of the scribes is in vain. 9The wise men are ashamed, they are dismayed and taken: lo, they have rejected the word of Yahuah; and what wisdom is in them?

This states that the pen of the scribes is in vain having rejected the word. Corrupting the word is an ancient practice and one must 'search diligently the scriptures' but in most cases since people don't believe in Hebrew it will not make a difference the knowledge of the bible. Then it is here we are left again with Paul:


Titus 3:9-11
 9 But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain. 10 A man that is an heretic after the first and second admonition reject; 11 Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.


It falls on us all at some point to make a decision, to reject the world or to accept it. Rejecting that Hebrew understanding is necessary is rejecting the Word. Accepting Jesus as is, is the basis being the anti-messiah doctrine and is the 'lawless one' whom paul aslo speaks of:

2 Thessalonians 2:7-8
7For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. 8And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom Yahuah shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:

There is a mystery for righteous and a mystery for the unrighteous, which is that of iniquity/lawlessness. Those who don't have the law or His Name, have nothing in Mashiach as these are the requirements for the kingdom (rev 22 12)

2 Thessalonians 2:13-15
13But we are bound to give thanks always to Alahim for you, brethren beloved of Yahuah, because Alahim hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth: 14Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Adoni Yahusha Ha Mashiach. 15Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.

Friday, September 18, 2015

From Babylon to Timbuktu (book review)

Article taken from: http://frombabylontotimbuktu.blogspot.com/

Monday, February 1, 2010

Book Review



Rudolph Windsor in his book From Babylon to Timbuktu: A History of Ancient Black Races including the Black Hebrews presents a thoroughly comprehensive history of the original Jews within the backdrop of ancient History. He traces their origins in Babylon within the loins of their forefather Abraham up to their birth and growth in the land of Canaan all the way up to their final dispersion from Palestine in 70 AD into the greater part of Africa, leading west.

Mr. Windsor exhibits a level of truth-telling that I have only seen in a few books.
He traces the history of the black African Hebrews of Egypt and Ethiopia. We are given lucid glimpses into the Tabiban Kamant and Wasambara Jews who are presently known as the Falashim of Ethiopia. He also takes on intellectual excursions into the backgrounds of the Jews of the Malagasy Republic, which is present day Madagascar. And from there, the reader treks in to the world of the North African Jews to the black Jewish kingdom of Ghana. Out of the Jewish kingdom of Ghana, Windsor relays the interesting story of Eldad the Danite who informed the Algerians of this Hebrew empire south of the Sahara in the western Sudan. Eldad lived in the ninth century. (p. 92)

It was from Windsor’s book that I began to scientifically consider the so-called “black race” originating from Asia and not Africa. He quotes a Herbert Wendt, a white German scholar who asserts, “All indications point to the fact that Asia was the cradle of the Black race.” (p.35) Wendt certainly makes some unsettling conclusions in his book It Began in Babel, another good book that is out-of-print.

Windsor maintains that even the early Talmudic scholars were black, the eminent Moses Maimonides (aka “Rambam”) being one of them. (p. 113) He then turns our attention to the black Jews of Angola known as the Mavumba, the Jews among the Ashanti, the Jews of Dahomey, and the Yoruba Jews of Nigeria. The Yoruba Jews in particular called themselves by the name of “B’nai Ephraim” or “Sons of Ephraim.”(p.131)

Windsor quotes Godbey, “These facts have peculiar significance when the presence of Judaism among American Negroes is to be considered. Hundreds of thousands of slaves were brought to America from this Western Africa during the days of the traffic, beginning nearly four hundred years ago." He also says: “How much more of Judaism survived among West African Negroes in that earlier time? As persecuted communities, they were rather more in danger than other Negroes of being raided by war parties and sold as slaves. It may be considered certain that many partially (why not fully?, is my question) Judaized Negroes were among the slaves in America. How many of them might still hold some Jewish customs here is another question." (Godbey, p. 246) It has been postulated by scholars that so-called “African-Americans” are descended from Yorubas.

If Godbey is right about “Judaized Negroes being in the traffic” (and I believe he is), then I am led to entertain that American blacks are descendants from the tribe of Ephraim, which is apart of the House of Joseph, Manasseh comprising the other half. I’m also led to think that they could be of the tribe of Asher, also being possible descendants of the Ashanti, the people of Ashan, which I’m thinking could be a derivative from Asher. Windsor, referencing Nahum Slouschz, says that the Hebrew tribes of Asher and Zebulon were in Carthage since the foundation of the city. (p. 108) Could it be that these Hebrews of Asher and Zebulon made their way to West Africa, as well? It is highly probable. Windsor makes an interesting point when discussing the Jewish expulsion from Spain in 1492: “These black Jews would naturally go to African countries most of all, because of less persecution and they could disguise themselves amongst the blacks.” (p. 116)

(UPDATE-06/18/2010: AFTER FURTHER STUDY OF THE SCRIPTURES, I AM NOW LED TO BELIEVE THAT AMERICAN BLACKS ARE DESCENDANTS OF THE TRIBE OF JUDAH-JOEL 3:6 OFFERS A SIGNIFICANT INSIGHT-"THE CHILDREN ALSO OF JUDAH AND THE CHILDREN OF JERUSALEM HAVE YE SOLD UNTO THE GRECIANS, THAT YE MIGHT REMOVE THEM FROM THEIR BORDER." There is a lot in that verse, but I deem it appropriate to leave it for another forum.)

Rudolph Windsor offers some interesting causes as to why American blacks are deplorably ignorant of their Hebraic past. The first is “the fall of Hebrew kingdoms.” The second is “the lack of communication with Jewish education centers,” and thirdly, “intense persecution and their deliberate blotting out of the mind their true nationality.” (p. 123) There is one final factor that Windsor fails to consider: knowledge of self and one’s history on the part of black people will only be realized through Yeshua the Moshiach of Israel through the Ruach Hakodesh. This is how this reviewer came into the understanding of his Hebraic past.

Windsor examines the causes for the fall of Hebrew kingdoms. He cites a Moroccan Jewish tradition that attributed their decline to epidemics, wars, and frequent conversions to Islam. (p.119) Windsor also explores how some Jews made it to West Africa by a very intriguing route...from Portugal. (p.115) During the Portuguese expulsions, many Jews fled into the West African coast by way of ships. Windsor relates, “As it has been mentioned before, King John of Portugal furnished ships in order to deport the Jews to any country they desired; however, unscrupulous Portuguese captains exacted as much money as they could from the Jews and dumped their human cargo at various places along the west African coast.” (p. 124)

And lastly, Windsor offers some very refreshing hope for the future in this area of research, “Continuous research is needed in African Hebrew History, especially in the excavation of ruined Hebrew cities of Africa. When this gigantic work is completed, I believe the evidence will reveal information that will amaze humanity. It is my sincere belief that a greater number of black Jews were deported to the western coast of Africa than is admitted by some writers.” (p.125)

I believe the denial of “some writers” is modest friendly assessment by Mr. Windsor. I would venture to say that most writers present dubious presentations of African Jews. I would also say that many have dropped the ball in this area and perhaps have been sadly conditioned into accepting that the Ashkenazi type is the genuine pictorial presentation of the modern Jew. It would be short of a miracle if genuine archaeological work was undertaken in this area. However, the Zionist power structure would have a lot to lose if such facts were brought to light. I thank the author, Mr. Windsor, for his work because it has given me the intellectual capital to further search this much neglected field out and to further discover my African Hebrew-Jewish past and ancestry. Rudolph Windsor’s work is so much of an ideological weapon that he ran into difficulty with many mainstream publishing houses that he was led to create his own, known as the Windsor’s Golden Series. I just wish he would write more.

Copyright © 2010 Emeth Book Review

Into Egypt Again With Ships (book review)

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Book Review



FROM THE BACK COVER:
INTO EGYPT AGAIN WITH SHIPS explains the spiritual implications regarding the more than 250 years of chattel slavery, 100 years of Jim Crow, semi-permanent underclass status, and loss of identity that “African Americans” have suffered in the United States. This book also reveals the biblical solution that will lead to the complete liberation of a people. All those who have descended from slaves, and consider themselves to be “Negro”, “Black”, or “African American” should have the audacity to read this book.


Into Egypt Again with Ships: A Message to the Forgotten Israelites (African Americans) by Elisha J. Israel is perhaps the most comprehensive and succinct exposition I’ve read on American blacks being indisputably Israelites. I read the book in its entirety over the course of a weekend.

Israel treats the so-called “African American” condition in the United States with sharp, spiritual precision. He argues that the dilemma of the so-called “African Americans” is spiritual and that they can identify this problem in the Holy Bible in the book of Deuteronomy at the 28th chapter.

Mr. Israel states in the Preface, “The greatest atrocity recorded in than annals of human history is without question the Transatlantic Slave Trade. It is estimated that anywhere from 20 to 100 million slaves died during the Middle Passage alone. The victims of slavery suffered the most wretched conditions imaginable…Furthermore, who are these people that were packed into the bowels of slave ships against their will? Will they ever be redeemed?”(p.5)

Israel confirms the conclusions of this reviewer that their redemption lies in the so-called “African American” entering back into covenant relationship with his God.

Mr. Israel offers a tremendous historical and geographical backdrop to substantiate his thesis. He affirms that Israel is in Africa and that it was the construction of the Suez Canal that “extracted ‘Middle Eastern’ countries from the African continent, among them the nation of Israel.” (p.7) Such a hijacking, Israel accurately claims has “altered the way most individuals view not only countries such as Egypt but Israel, as well.” (p. 8)

The author also demonstrates from the scripture the color of the original Biblical Hebrew-Israelites. For we in read in Lamentations 4:7, “Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies, their polishing was of sapphire:” (p. 21) On page 22, he quotes Lamentations 4:8, “Their visage is blacker than a coal; they are not known in the streets: their skin cleaveth to their bones; it is withered, it is become like a stick.” Mr. Israel also shares on the same page from Lamentations 5:10, “Our skin was black like an oven because of the terrible famine.” He also shares a verses I grew up hearing describing the color of Jesus the Messiah in Revelation 1:14-15, “His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.” (pp. 22-23)

Mr. Israel tackles the taboo subject of who these Ashkenazim are. They are of the stock of Edom. He quotes Genesis 15:23 to introduce his position, “And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.” (p.66) He chronicles Edom’s animosity towards Jacob’s seed by quoting Numbers 20:17-21, “Let us pass, I pray thee, through thy country: we will not pass through the fields, or through the vineyards, neither will we drink of the water of the wells: we will go by the king's high way, we will not turn to the right hand nor to the left, until we have passed thy borders. And Edom said unto him, Thou shalt not pass by me, lest I come out against thee with the sword. And the children of Israel said unto him, We will go by the high way: and if I and my cattle drink of thy water, then I will pay for it: I will only, without doing anything else, go through on my feet. And he said, Thou shalt not go through. And Edom came out against him with much people, and with a strong hand. Thus Edom refused to give Israel passage through his border: wherefore Israel turned away from him.” (p. 67)

Israel illustrates that the Zionist takeover and occupation of Palestine was prophesied in the Scripture. He quotes Ezekiel 36:5, “Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Surely in the fire of my jealousy have I spoken against the residue of the heathen, and against all Idumea, which have appointed my land into their possession with the joy of all their heart, with despiteful minds, to cast it out for a prey.” (p. 70) The Edomite-Zionist Jew’s prosperity is also prophesied in the Scripture. Mr. Israel shares from Genesis 27:38-40, “And Esau said unto his father, Hast thou but one blessing, my father? bless me, even me also, O my father. And Esau lifted up his voice, and wept. And Isaac his father answered and said unto him, Behold, thy dwelling shall be the fatness of the earth, and of the dew of heaven from above; And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck.”

After reading such passages as these in their proper historical context everything becomes crystal clear.

More than anything else, I lavishly applaud Mr. Israel’s emphasis on the centrality of Jesus Christ the Messiah. He forewarns those Israelites who reject Yehoshua as the Messiah sent from God (Hashem). He devotes an in depth chapter establishing how the Old Testament speaks of Christ in every detail. This chapter alone is worth the read. He does some excellent clarification on the use of “Jesus”, “Yeshua”, etc. Israel writes, “For many years there has been an ongoing controversy regarding the validity of using the name of Jesus instead of ‘Yeshua’, ‘Yahoshua’, ‘Yahsua’, or some other name…Regarding original Hebrew, what people must understand is that almost every name can be translated or transliterated from language to language, and the name of ‘Jesus’ is no different.” (p.104)

Regarding the “Zeus controversy” for example, Mr. Israel remarks it “is simply an issue of transliteration. The name ‘Jesus’ comes into English from the New Testament, which was written in Greek. In the Greek alphabet there was not a way to express the ‘sh’ sound to fully transliterate the name ‘Yeshua’ into Greek. This is how we came to get ‘Iesous’. Since the ending of the word ‘Iesous’ is ‘sous’ some have claimed that there existed an evil plot to replace the name of the Messiah with one that means ‘Zeus’ or ‘son of Zeus.’ (I read somewhere that ‘Iesous’ meant ‘like Zeus’) This is inaccurate for several reasons…” The reader is encouraged to consult page 105 for further details on the linguistic complexities and their subsequent clarifications.

Ultimately, the solution for the Black community is not found in the leadership of man. The majority of so-called “Black leaders” have proven to be careerist yes-men and women. Instead of partnering with a leader, Israel asserts that we should partner with God in our struggle. Mr. Israel eloquently states, “Although many solutions have been proposed, unless Israel again makes a similar covenant between themselves and God and are obedient to His laws, statutes, and commandments their condition will not improve. In these last days, there must be a spiritual covenant rather than an economic, social, or political one.” (p. 136) The regathering and restoration of Israel will occur at a future time. Elisha J. Israel quotes Jeremiah 23:5-8 and Ezekiel 34:11-12 among others to affirm his conclusions. (pp. 141-143)

He concludes by stating, “…Israel will not be gathered fully until the fast approaching Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Contrary to popular teaching of many Biblical scholars and pastors, a genuine gathering of the Israelites or the Jews is not presently occurring. There will be a spiritual awakening of the Children of Israel to their identity and purpose. This awakening will occur prior to Jesus’ Second Advent. Then the elect of God will be gathered from around the world. There is no doubt that salvation for this people is soon to come.” (p. 144)

Copyright © 2010 Emeth Book Review. All Rights Reserved.

"Specializing in the reading and review of rare and obscure books, particularly related to the study of the Hebrews of antiquity and their descendants throughout the Diaspora. We will specifically explore books that confirm the African genesis of the Hebrew way of life as it was expressed in the Yahvism found within their Scriptures."
 

100 Amazing Facts About the Negro (book review)

Sunday, March 14, 2010

Book Review



100 Amazing Facts About the Negro with Complete Proof: A Short Cut to the World History of the Negro.

Joel Augustus Rogers’ book 100 Amazing Facts About the Negro with Complete Proof: A Short Cut to the World History of the Negro is an astounding compendium of irrefutable facts that confirm the Black man’s central position in World History. It is a comprehensive sketch compiled from international documented scholarly sources. In his book, Rogers provides penetrating evidence to support that the Biblical Jews were indeed a black people.

On pp. 14-15, Rogers asserts: “The characters of the Bible are largely Negroes…Tacitus, the Roman historian of 90 A.D., says that the Romans of his day popularly believed that the Jews, which then abounded in Europe, came from Ethiopia, the land of the Blacks…Chaldea, the land from which the Jews originated, was also a Negro land, hence Abraham might also have been black.” Rogers knew Abraham was Black. He postulates for hypothetical purposes.

Without belaboring the issue, the reviewer will let the scientific facts speak for themselves (pp. 32-34):

The Koran reads: “And he (Moses) drew forth his hand out of his bosom and behold it appeared white unto the spectators.” (Chap. Vii, p. 128) “And put thy right hand under thy left arm; it shall come forth white.” (Sale: Al Koran, p. 257. 1784.)

Sale adds: “There is a tradition that Moses was a very swarthy man.” (p. 128)

Sir T.W. Arnold says, “According to Mohammedan tradition, Moses was a black man.” (The Preaching of Islam, p. 106. Westminster, 1896.)

The Vulgate and the modern Bible say that Moses’ hand was leprous as snow,” but the Septuagint Bible, which is the oldest translation, dating to about 150 B.C., accords with the Koran. The Septuagint says that Moses’ hand became as snow,” and that when he placed it in his bosom the second time “it was restored to the complexion of the other flesh.” (Exod. IV. 6.) Here is the clearest inference that the miracle lay in turning black skin, white, and then changing it to black again. I have similar references on this subject.

The argument so often made that Miriam’s objection to Moses’ Ethiopian wife was one of color, is wrong. There was no color prejudice then. Besides the Jews at thaty time were also colored. Miriam’s objection must have been a national or tribal one, the same as exists among the Negroes on the West African coast now, and among the Jews themselves in India.

Tacitus says: “Many again say that they (the Jews) were a race of Ethiopian origin.” (Book V, Chap. 2)

F. Ratzel says: “The entire Semitic and Hamitic population of Africa was a mulatto character which extends to the Semites outside of Africa.” (History of Mankind, Vol. II, p. 246)

M. Fishberg, a leading Jewish authority, says: “Contrary to generally accepted theory that they (the Jews) have maintained their racial purity for centuries by modern anthropological methods has shown that the physical type of the Jews bears a striking resemblance to the ethnic types encountered in indigenous races and peoples among whom they happen to live.” (North African Jews, p. 1, New York, 1906.) That is to say that in the black man’s land the Jew is black; in the brown man’s land, brown; and in the white man’s land, white, etc. Fishberg gives abundant illustration of this by pictures. For the Negro Jew, see his book “The Jew,” pp. 120-134, 146, 149, 174, 178, 181. F. Hertz says: “In China, the Jews are hardly to be distinguished from the Chinese; in Africa they look like the Negro….”

Abraham came from Ur of the Chaldees (Gen. 11, 31) Godfrey Higgins, a careful and reliable English antiquary says, “The Chaldees were originally Negroes.” (Anacalypsis, Vol. II, p. 364. New York, 1927) For the number of Jews, who entered and left Egypt, see Gen. 46:27 and Exod., 12:37. For the number of years in Egypt: Exod. 12:20.

As regards the Negro origin of the Jew, Count Abraham Gurowski, of Poland, says, “Numbers of Jews have the greatest resemblance to American mulattoes. Sallow carnation complexion, thick lips, criped black hair. Of all the Jewish population scattered over the globe one-fourth dwells in Poland. I am therefore acquainted with their features. On my arrival in this country (the United States) I took every light colored mulatto for a Jew.” (America and Europe, p.117, N.Y., 1857)

Sir H. H. Johnson attributes much of the prejudice against the Jew to the latter’s Negro origin. He says: “In the Jew, as in the Egyptian and the Moor, there is a varying but still discernible element of the Negro, derived in the case of the Jew from the strong infusion of Elamite blood and in the case of the Moor from the obvious connection with the Negro….” (World Position of the Negro and Negroid, in G. Spiller: universal races Congress, p. 330, London, 1911.) But this viewpoint is wrong. There is very little or no prejudice against the Negro in Europe, outside of England. In Vienna the darkest Negroes are welcomed in places from which the fairest Jew is barred. Morever, this opposition against the Jew is to be found even in the black and brown men’s lands. Algeria was recently the scene of much anti-Jewish rioting.

For the classing together of Jew and Ethiopian, see Amos 9:7
(Amos 9:7: “Are ye not as children of the Ethiopians unto me, O children of Israel? saith the LORD. Have not I brought up Israel out of the land of Egypt? and the Philistines from Caphtor, and the Syrians from Kir?”)

For a discussion at length of the Egyptian and Ethiopian origin of the Jews, see: Gerald Massy: A Book of the Beginnings, Vol. II, pt. 2, pp. 364-441, London 1881. See also Chapter, “Were the Jews Originally Negroes,” pp. 91-95, in Sex and Race, Vol. I, 1941.

Fishberg says of the Falasha Jews: “They are of the Negro type,…the large lips, the prognathism, and frizzly hair, all point to the Negro origin.” (The Jew, p. 147.) I have seen the Falashas in Abyssinia and the Negro Jews in Egypt and the Sudan. West Africa has black Jews also.

H. Norden says of the Abyssinian Jews, “My stay among them carried something of the quality of interest and excitement of ther imagination with the sight of things excavated after centuries of burial. It formed a bridge from the present to the past. Biblical chronicles were no longer to me merely ancient religious history. They became the records of the life of a people not unlike the Falashas.” (Chap. “Among the Black Jews” in Africa’s Last Empire,” p. 203.)

Whilst in Ethiopia I visited the Falasha school established by Br. Faitlovich. The boys were all jet-black with wooly hair.

For the Jewish conquest of Abyssinia see L.J. Morie: Histoire de L’Ethiope, Vol II, p. 181-83, Paris, 1904: African Society Jour., Vol. 28, p. 60)

The Black Jews of India “are kept at a respectable distance and not permitted to enter the synagogues of the whites nor do they bury their dead in the same cemetery.” (M. Fishberg: The Jew, p. 134: Isaac, I.A. Cochin Jews, 1917.)

Copyright © 2010 Emeth Book Review. All Rights Reserved.

"Specializing in the reading and review of rare and obscure books, particularly related to the study of the Hebrews of antiquity and their descendants throughout the Diaspora. We will specifically explore books that confirm the African genesis of the Hebrew way of life as it was expressed in the Yahvism found within their Scriptures."

Pre-Marital Sex pt.3




The Modern State of Israel


Did you know this?

The British who prior to World War 2 declared that there would be no more immigration of Jews to Palestine in order to protect the Palestinians from their acts of terror against both them and British soldiers, transfer control of Palestine to the United Nations.

The United Nations resolve to have Palestine partitioned into two states, one Jewish and one Arab, with Jerusalem to remain as an international zone to be enjoyed by all religious faiths.

a) UN had no right to give Arab property to anyone

b) It was an unjust division of lands based on population density and ownership of lands without any compensation or sale of rights by the land owners.

UN Resolution 181

Jews owned only 6% of Palestine at that time, with a  population about 60,000.

Palestinians (Arab Christians and Muslims owned 94% of Palestine with a population of about less then a million

Resolution 181 granted the Jews 57% of the land leaving the Arabs who at that time had 94% with only 43%. of their own lands.


This transfer is scheduled to take place on May 15th, 1948.


At midnight on May 14th, the State of Israel is officially, “proclaimed,” in Tel Aviv. Eleven minutes later President Truman declares the United States as the first foreign nation to recognise it.


Meaning just hours before UN can ratify this unjust Resolution, yet with the intention of having TWO Separate States in Palestine and Jerusalem being an INTERNATIONAL   ZONE for all faiths, the jews establish the illegitimate state of Israel in defiance  of UN resolution 181 and America supports it in 11 minutes!


Flat Earth